This has been implemented. Testing it now and then will queue up for the next release, likely in the next 1-2 days!
Ryan Cush
Team•
Jul 7
Yes, I agree that we should add a “include subfolders” option on Autostack which would do exactly this. Of course, keep in mind that Autostack itself already takes a folder full of images and separates them into stacks. But I recognize that sometimes you have them already manually divided, and in that case, I’m assuming you would want it to respect your foldered-stacks and just process those as-is? Versus applying the Autostack logic and possibly splitting your subfolders into subfolders/substacks based on timestamp.
Mikael Palokangas
•
Jul 8
Yes that is correct (I made this question before noticing you can login)
Log in to comment and vote
Comments3
Ryan Cush
Jul 9
This has been implemented. Testing it now and then will queue up for the next release, likely in the next 1-2 days!
Ryan Cush
Jul 7
Yes, I agree that we should add a “include subfolders” option on Autostack which would do exactly this. Of course, keep in mind that Autostack itself already takes a folder full of images and separates them into stacks. But I recognize that sometimes you have them already manually divided, and in that case, I’m assuming you would want it to respect your foldered-stacks and just process those as-is? Versus applying the Autostack logic and possibly splitting your subfolders into subfolders/substacks based on timestamp.
Mikael Palokangas
Jul 8
Yes that is correct (I made this question before noticing you can login)